9 edition of In defense of political philosophy found in the catalog.
In defense of political philosophy
Jeffrey H. Reiman
Includes bibliographical references.
|Statement||[by] Jeffrey H. Reiman.|
|Series||Harper torchbooks, TB 1684|
|Contributions||Wolff, Robert Paul., Paul Avrich Collection (Library of Congress)|
|LC Classifications||JC571 .R45|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||xxxii, 87 p.|
|Number of Pages||87|
|LC Control Number||72080550|
Based on his survey of all of the different regimes known to his time, this book contains Aristotle’s key and massively influential statements on the nature of political life. It is also a kind of defense of political life, which portrays in vivid detail what it means to be an involved member of a . In Defense of Anarchism is a book by the philosopher Robert Paul Wolff, in which the author defends individualist anarchism. He argues that individual autonomy and state authority are mutually exclusive and that, as individual autonomy is inalienable, the moral legitimacy of the state collapses.
The self-defense I discuss in this essay is political because the self being defended is political, and as such it requires both normative and strategic considerations. This project seeks to articulate the dynamics of power at work in self-defense and the constitution of the self through its social relations and conflicts. The next document, Calhoun’s “Speech on the Reception of Abolition Petitions,” focuses on one of the most controversial issues of Calhoun’s political career, his defense of slavery. Because Calhoun’s reputation is so often linked to his remarks on this subject, both the first report and the revised report have been included here.
In this book, the authors propose an original philosophical account of shame aimed at answering these questions. The book begins with a detailed examination of the evidence and arguments that are taken to support what they call the two dogmas about shame: its alleged social nature and Author: Julien Deonna. I find it to be an excellent account of Kant’s political philosophy that, among other things, provides a compelling defense for the special moral status of the basic structure of society. I’d also nominate Rawls’ “Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy.” It isn’t “Theory,” of course, but it’s stellar as a history text.
Draft proposals for Commission guidelines on standards of supervision in swimming pools.
Recent theorisations of corporatism
Curriculum for American Indian youth
Muslim memorial to the Prime Minister.
R&R for American Schools
Lectures vpon the twelue Articles of our Christian faith
Analysis of linear features mapped from Landsat images of the Cascade Range, Washington, Oregon, and California
Socialism and the politics of radical redistribution
Constitutional court decesions.
Major Energy Companies of Western Europe, 1985
Political authority, Reiman argues, is justified if the existence of a given coercive system of The main part of the book goes something like this: In defense of political philosophy book assertion that there can be no compatibility between moral autonomy and moral authority is a truism.3/5.
Josef Pieper's book titled IN DEFENSE OF PHILOSOPHY is a book that readers should carefully consider. Pieper wrote this book to give philosophical meaning to life. He was clear that in a society that admires technology and "practical wisdom" as opposed to those who think and comtemplate about abstract realities such as good vs.
evil, ethics /5(8). Lecture 24 - In Defense of Politics Overview. This final lecture of the course is given “in defense of politics.” First, the idea and definition of “politics” and the “political” are discussed with reference to the ideas of Immanuel Kant and twentieth-century political scientists, novelists, and philosophers such as Bernard Crick, E.
Forster, and Carl Schmitt. In defense of political philosophy;: A reply to Robert Paul Wolff's In defense of anarchism (Torchbook library editions) [Reiman, Jeffrey H] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
In defense of political philosophy;: A reply to Robert Paul Wolff's In defense of anarchism (Torchbook library editions)Author: Jeffrey H Reiman. George Will’s Political Philosophy. But perhaps In defense of political philosophy book answer is implicit in the book. Conservatism for Will is the defense of an a priori truth asserted as “self-evident” by the founding.
Leo Strauss’s What Is Political Philosophy. addresses almost every major theme in his life’s work and is often viewed as a defense of his overall philosophic approach. Yet precisely because the book is so foundational, if we want to understand Strauss’s notoriously careful and complex thinking in these essays, we must also consider them just as Strauss treated philosophers of the past.
Political philosophy, then, is the study of the theories behind politics. These theories may be used to gain power or to justify its existence.
Mostly, however, they have been used to justify or legitimate the existence of contemporary political structures by appealing to "rationality," "reason," or. Political philosophy is quite an incredibly broad topic which can go back at least two millennia, so obviously there would be tons of stuffs to read in this field.
You need to greatly narrow down your criteria. From A to Ž (Aristotle to Žižek) you. In this illuminating celebration of the political world, Bernard Crick asserts that politics, with its compromises and power struggles, remains the only tested alternative to government by coercion, making both freedom and order possible in heterogeneous societies.
For Crick, politics is messy and complex, and his book defends it against those who would identify it with (and reduce it to. Harvey C. Mansfield studies and teaches political philosophy. He has written on Edmund Burke and the nature of political parties, on Machiavelli and the invention of indirect government, in defense of a defensible liberalism and in favor of a Constitutional American political science.
In Defense of Anarchism is a book by the philosopher Robert Paul Wolff, in which the author defends individualist argues that individual autonomy and state authority are mutually exclusive and that, as individual autonomy is inalienable, the moral legitimacy of the state collapses.
First published by Harper and Row in as In Defense of Anarchism: With a Reply to Jeffrey Author: Robert Paul Wolff. This course is intended as an introduction to political philosophy as seen through an examination of some of the major texts and thinkers of the Western political tradition.
Three broad themes that are central to understanding political life are focused upon: the polis experience (Plato, Aristotle), the sovereign state (Machiavelli, Hobbes. In Defense of Plato’s Republic March 2, Septem By Joseph G. Trabbic For Socrates, the city isn’t only an arbitrarily chosen device for illuminating the soul’s mysteries but an essential means for creating and sustaining justice and the other virtues in the soul.
Leo Strauss’s What Is Political Philosophy. addresses almost every major theme in his life’s work and is often viewed as a defense of his overall philosophic approach.
Yet precisely because the book is so foundational, if we want to understand Strauss’s notoriously careful and complex thinking in these essays, we must also consider them just as Strauss treated philosophers of the past. Additional Physical Format: Online version: Reiman, Jeffrey H. In defense of political philosophy.
New York, Harper & Row  (OCoLC) Online version. Some of the most interesting points of this small but powerful book, In Defense of Philosophy by Josef Pieper (Trans. Lothar Krauth. Ignatius Press: San Francisco, ) include a defense of the wisdom of a variety of classical and medieval philosophers as their ideas apply to the modern person.
Naturally, as the title alludes, Pieper. This is not so much about "anarchism" as it is about the legitimation crisis of representative and majoritarian democracy. The book started out in the s as an essay called "The Fundamental Problem of Political Theory", but eventually came to be called "The Impossibility of a Solution to the Fundamental Problem of Political Philosophy".Cited by: Yoram Hazony has articulated a most clear and sensible, and largely persuasive vision of a free and decent society.
There is much to agree with in his pungent and challenging analysis: he is absolutely right to stress the limits of a doctrinaire rationalism that ignores the wisdom of experience and tradition, as well as the Read more about: In Defense of Political Reason.
Billionaire philanthropist George Soros’s new book In Defense of Open Society reads like his last will and testament, an attempt to ensure that his philanthropic work will have a respected legacy.
The book is a collection of previously published essays and speeches selected by Soros to explain his worldview, along with some unpublished writings and a preface. Anyone who has not been living Author: Shane Devine.
Additional Physical Format: Online version: Reiman, Jeffrey H. In defense of political philosophy. New York, Harper & Row  (OCoLC). Franco proves his mastery of Oakeshott's writings from the very start by taking the reader through Experience and Its Modes (), locating Oakeshott's skeptical defense of philosophy: in a field occupied by Hobbes, Hegel, and Collingwood, and suggesting how this initial defense is the ground for his later writings Franco mounts an."A deep and provocative discussion of some of the most fundamental issues in political philosophy, written crisply, with candor, in a style that I find very winning.
It is a most useful book, and a very good one."--Carl Cohen, author of Communism, Fascism, and Democracy"A provocative and engrossing introduction to current questions of political legitimacy, consent, deliberative democracy, the 4/5(1).A New Philosophy of Defense.
George F. Kennan. Febru Issue. thus find themselves compelled to devise an independent defense policy that makes sense with regard to the military and political realities of the present day. The question addressed in this book is essentially this: Where is the peace-loving, nonaggressive, and.